With the shattering of the Ivory Tower in which "Climate Scientists"had ensconced themselves, the question now falls on all Science; Are conclusions of Man-induced environmental effects so easily justified?
Take this piece from The Wall Street Journal, for example:
So, is the skeptic truly coming to the fore in Climate Change science? As one commentator noted the other day, Science is about exploring hypothesis by disqualifying one likely cause after another, rather than trumpeting one favorite cause as "the consensus." In the absence of disproving a myriad of possible environmental effects upon climate change, the dishonest scientists in question and their political masters declared a "consensus" that clearly has not been proven.
So we now see that "Economic Suicide" is not a truly popular or populist political option, especially for an Administration that seems to be in a swift decline.
Will the Administration see that it's also "Economic Suicide" to sacrifice the Ag Economy of Central California for dead or dying fish?
Stay tuned!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment